The Edimax IC-1510wg. Say cheese alright.

A few years back I.P cameras were a bit of a hot mod for computer users who liked to try out the latest hardware. Hot on the heels of wireless networking these over priced but potentially useful beauties offered cable less surveillance and home security cheaper than CCTV systems with the added benefit of uploading camera footage direct to a remote and secure server.
A number of proprietary network hardware vendors climbed the bandwagon and launched an array of kit with prices to match features and functionality.
A few years later and a mature IT product is left failing to live up to its potential in terms of usage or performance. Presumably, one would think the design boffs’ spotting a dead duck when they saw one moved on the next ‘next big thing in IT’ leaving this kwacker to rest in peace.
Now it would be unfair to condemn all IP cameras to the same critical fate but they seem to fall into two categories: really expensive IP cameras, and really cheap nasty ones. Que, the Edimax IC-1510wg.
With a device so awesome in its rubbishness it’s difficult to decide where to begin. At £50 one may think it is cheap. And in the general scheme of things, you’d be right. But a web cam can be bought for a fiver, retail. A wireless router for £15 likewise. So if it were possible to solder the wires of one to the other that’d be £20 quid, then. So now it’s not looking that cheap. And it is a cheap IP camera.
It has a 0.3 mega pix sensor. Now, those of you who use a digital camera (and I guess that’s most people, these days) might wonder if I’ve made a typographical error. Don’t I mean 3 mega pix? Er, no. The image quality on this baby is so piss poor that, as a surveillance cam, you might be able to identify what colour cat is crapping on your nicely mown lawn but you are not going to be spotting any car number plates as they pass by in splendid blur-O-motion. If you can manage to get the exposure settings anywhere near (and I couldn’t) you might be able to identify what colour the car actually was.
So as a surveillance camera how does it perform. Well, as you might expect, suitably badly. The camera’s video stream only functions with Internet Explorer which is a major drawback seen as IE is on a nosedive. On that point alone the device is pretty well made obsolete.
When you do eventually get it set up on your network which is another major bind, particularly for those people who have their nets properly set up because the cameras IP is on the 192.168.2.xxx sub net. Thats the default for Belking router kit and no other. So if you are unfortunate enough to be using a Belkin router then you’ll love this IP camera! For the rest of us, you’ll have to re-config your IP addresses just to re-config your camera IP to your network. And my camera default IP, according to the manual, wasnt what it actually was. clearly some twat at the factory was having a joke.
So, where was I? Oh, yes. So when you finally get the video streaming on the worlds worst browser you can then set up the motion capture. I couldn’t get it to capture an image, even on the most sensitive settings. That included cars and people moving past the window. I did, however, manage to get a pile of captured images of the camera automatically resetting the exposure settings, all in a very fetching pink over-expose. And there’s no exposure ‘reset-to-default’ so I guess i’m stuck with it.
I could go on but this camera doesn’t deserve the effort required to condemn it. So in summary: it, like all other Edimax hardware I’ve ever used is utter rubbish. Avoid.
Addendum:
Well, after putting the camera through it’s paces last night I can confirm that it is still rubbish. The image sensor is far too light-sensitive. In cloudless daylight (yes we did have one this year) the image was massively over exposed even using auto exposure. When over exposed you will get a white image or a pink one depending on how over exposed it is. I discovered that with the addition of an optical filter (well, my sunglasses) the image becomes almost useful.

Before...

- After…
So, providing you’re happy to faff around with it you’ll be fine. Or just use it a dusk when it’s actually quite a good (relatively speaking) image.
Motion capture is still inadequate. I did manage to capture some movement although small objects (like cats) were not recorded and there are plenty of those around her, I can tell you. Objects that were captured included a transit van driving past and people walking close to the camera. In distance all objects captured were at about 10-20 feet away. Nothing else was captured.
The pedestal base does not fit a camera tripod, either. The manufacturer clearly saw it fixed to a wall (screws and rawl plugs are provided).
If you are thinking about some covert operations and disguising the camera in a box note that it does generate some heat. Anyone thinking about burying it under a pile of clothes as part of some depraved shag-cam arrangement may find it bursting into flames well before the denouement of the exercise. Or maybe not.